Review



2-way analysis of variance (anova) and holm-sidak multiple comparisons tests  (GraphPad Software Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol GraphPad Software Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    GraphPad Software Inc 2-way analysis of variance (anova) and holm-sidak multiple comparisons tests
    Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups <t>using</t> <t>Holm-Sidak</t> multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way <t>ANOVA.</t> Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.
    2 Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) And Holm Sidak Multiple Comparisons Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pmc12212448-86-9-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2-way analysis of variance (anova) and holm-sidak multiple comparisons tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Treatment Efficacy of a Dual Release of Aflibercept and Dexamethasone From a Single Hydrogel Drug Delivery System in a Rodent Model"

    Article Title: Treatment Efficacy of a Dual Release of Aflibercept and Dexamethasone From a Single Hydrogel Drug Delivery System in a Rodent Model

    Journal: Translational Vision Science & Technology

    doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.6.31

    Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.

    Techniques Used:

    Histological evaluation of CNV lesions. ( a ) Representative histology images of CNV lesions from the No Treatment group ( black ), the Blank-DDS group ( blue ), the Bolus AFL group ( pink ), the AFL-DDS group ( green ), the DEX-DDS group ( dark purple ), and the Combo-DDS group ( light purple ). ( b ) Representative images for No Treatment. ( c ) Representative image for Combo-DDS. Statistically significant differences between groups were determined using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P <0.05 is represented by *.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Histological evaluation of CNV lesions. ( a ) Representative histology images of CNV lesions from the No Treatment group ( black ), the Blank-DDS group ( blue ), the Bolus AFL group ( pink ), the AFL-DDS group ( green ), the DEX-DDS group ( dark purple ), and the Combo-DDS group ( light purple ). ( b ) Representative images for No Treatment. ( c ) Representative image for Combo-DDS. Statistically significant differences between groups were determined using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P <0.05 is represented by *.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc 2-way analysis of variance (anova) and holm-sidak multiple comparisons tests
    Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups <t>using</t> <t>Holm-Sidak</t> multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way <t>ANOVA.</t> Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.
    2 Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) And Holm Sidak Multiple Comparisons Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pmc12212448-86-9-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    2-way analysis of variance (anova) and holm-sidak multiple comparisons tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc analysis of variance (anova) and sidak’s multiple comparisons test
    Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups <t>using</t> <t>Holm-Sidak</t> multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way <t>ANOVA.</t> Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.
    Analysis Of Variance (Anova) And Sidak’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pm40573883-124-23-28?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    analysis of variance (anova) and sidak’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc student’s test, one-way analysis of variance (anova) with tukey or sidak’s multiple comparison test
    Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups <t>using</t> <t>Holm-Sidak</t> multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way <t>ANOVA.</t> Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.
    Student’s Test, One Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) With Tukey Or Sidak’s Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/10__1016_slash_j__nantod__2024__102307-373-8-17?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    student’s test, one-way analysis of variance (anova) with tukey or sidak’s multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc two-way analysis of variance (anova) with sidak’s multiple comparisons test
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    Two Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) With Sidak’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pmc10863412-288-12-29?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two-way analysis of variance (anova) with sidak’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc ordinary one-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by sidak's multiple comparison test using graphpad prism 8
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    Ordinary One Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Followed By Sidak's Multiple Comparison Test Using Graphpad Prism 8, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/10__1039_slash_d4fb00077c-159-10-22?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ordinary one-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by sidak's multiple comparison test using graphpad prism 8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc two-way analysis of variance (anova) test and sidak’s multiple comparisons test
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    Two Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Test And Sidak’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pm32844181-80-74-78?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two-way analysis of variance (anova) test and sidak’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc ordinary one-way analysis of variance (anova; sidak’s multiple-comparison test)
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    Ordinary One Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova; Sidak’s Multiple Comparison Test), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/10__1128_slash_aac__00602___21-315-12-17?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ordinary one-way analysis of variance (anova; sidak’s multiple-comparison test) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc one-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by sidak’s multiple comparisons test
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    One Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Followed By Sidak’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pm32323162-84-12-19?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    one-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by sidak’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GraphPad Software Inc two-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by sidak’s multiple comparisons test
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    Two Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) Followed By Sidak’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pmc05457115-158-16-20?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two-way analysis of variance (anova) followed by sidak’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Jandel Engineering two-way analysis of variance (anova) with repeated measures, followed by a holm-sidak pairwise multiple comparison test
    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with <t>Sidak’s</t> multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.
    Two Way Analysis Of Variance (Anova) With Repeated Measures, Followed By A Holm Sidak Pairwise Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by Jandel Engineering, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/analysis+of+variance+%28anova%29+and+sidak%E2%80%99s+multiple+comparisons+test/pmc02034448-74-12-29?v=Jandel+Engineering
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two-way analysis of variance (anova) with repeated measures, followed by a holm-sidak pairwise multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.

    Journal: Translational Vision Science & Technology

    Article Title: Treatment Efficacy of a Dual Release of Aflibercept and Dexamethasone From a Single Hydrogel Drug Delivery System in a Rodent Model

    doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.6.31

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Percent changes in CNV lesion area relative to week 0 for all treatment groups at each time point. Experiment groups included: No Treatment ( black ; n = 30 lesions), Blank-DDS ( blue ; n = 28 lesions), Bolus AFL ( pink ; n = 36 lesions), AFL-DDS ( green ; n = 35 lesions), DEX-DDS ( dark purple ; n = 35 lesions), and Combo-DDS ( light purple ; n = 32 lesions). Statistically significant differences were determined between groups using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P < 0.05 is represented by *, P < 0.01 is represented by **, P < 0.001 is represented by ***, and P < 0.0001 by ****.

    Article Snippet: Statistical analysis will be performed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests (GraphPad Prism 9).

    Techniques:

    Histological evaluation of CNV lesions. ( a ) Representative histology images of CNV lesions from the No Treatment group ( black ), the Blank-DDS group ( blue ), the Bolus AFL group ( pink ), the AFL-DDS group ( green ), the DEX-DDS group ( dark purple ), and the Combo-DDS group ( light purple ). ( b ) Representative images for No Treatment. ( c ) Representative image for Combo-DDS. Statistically significant differences between groups were determined using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P <0.05 is represented by *.

    Journal: Translational Vision Science & Technology

    Article Title: Treatment Efficacy of a Dual Release of Aflibercept and Dexamethasone From a Single Hydrogel Drug Delivery System in a Rodent Model

    doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.6.31

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Histological evaluation of CNV lesions. ( a ) Representative histology images of CNV lesions from the No Treatment group ( black ), the Blank-DDS group ( blue ), the Bolus AFL group ( pink ), the AFL-DDS group ( green ), the DEX-DDS group ( dark purple ), and the Combo-DDS group ( light purple ). ( b ) Representative images for No Treatment. ( c ) Representative image for Combo-DDS. Statistically significant differences between groups were determined using Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests after repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA. Statistical differences of P <0.05 is represented by *.

    Article Snippet: Statistical analysis will be performed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons tests (GraphPad Prism 9).

    Techniques:

    S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.

    Journal: Infection and Immunity

    Article Title: Metabolic diversity of human macrophages: potential influence on Staphylococcus aureus intracellular survival

    doi: 10.1128/iai.00474-23

    Figure Lengend Snippet: S. aureus MprF is critical for intracellular survival in HMDMs and biofilm formation. HMDMs were exposed to S. aureus WT or ∆ mprF under ( A ) competition or ( B ) mono-infection conditions and lysed to quantify intracellular bacterial burden at the indicated time points using a gentamicin protection assay ( n = 4 from one experiment; * P < 0.05 and **** P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ( C ) To determine the effect of intracellular survival on biofilm formation, HMDMs were stained with CellTracker Deep Red (red) and then infected with either GFP-expressing S. aureus WT pCM29 or ∆ mprF pCM29 (green). Z-stacks (1 µM) were acquired using confocal microscopy at 2- or 24-h post-infection and 3D rendering was performed.

    Article Snippet: Significant differences were determined using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, or unpaired Student’s t -test using GraphPad Prism version 9.0.2.

    Techniques: Infection, Staining, Expressing, Confocal Microscopy